Public Interest Transportation Forum

An Independent E-zine on Public Transportation
and Mobility Issues in the Puget Sound Region

PITF has been on-line since 1996!

Last Update: May 17, 2009

If you jumped here from Google, please click here to improve readability

Hosted by Global Telematics in Seattle

Founders: Dick Nelson, John Niles, and Jerry Schneider
Editor in Chief: John Niles
Contributing Authors: James MacIsaac, Emory Bundy, Rich Harkness, Don Padelford

Lead Stories

Sound Transit describes Eastside alignment options for light rail in EIS; informal comment period extends through mid-year 2010

Seattle's Light Rail testing is underway to qualify Sound Transit for a gala July 18th opening: a collision every 12 days of full operation was forecast in the 1999 Environmental Impact Statement

University Link construction gets underway: climate-changing greenhouse gas CO2 emitted during its construction is not compensated by reduced motor vehicle emissions until more than 40 years of light rail operation have passed, according to the U.S. Government.

Campaign messages that helped Sound Transit win the November 2008 Prop 1 election to double its taxes and expand the light rail network

Summary: What Prop 1 Does and Does Not Do for the central Puget Sound region

Very Small Portion of Prop 1 Taxes Go to Relieve Bus Overcrowding

Sound Transit's Prop 1 Victory Sends Taxes Soaring Upward for Little Effect on Regional Mobility 

Intriguing Essay: "A Great City, Maybe" by X

Bus Rapid Transit vs Light Rail in Metropolitan Seattle: Guest Essay by Don Padleford

$107 Billion tax collection authorized in the Prop 1 mass transit tax that passed November 4, 2008

Sound Transit's Proposition 1 doubles transportation sales taxes.

There they go again: Sound Transit falsely claims in 2008 that benefits exceed costs in light rail expansion, just like the agency claimed in 2007.

Sound Transit shows station and tunnel plans for the light rail Seattle Subway to Capitol Hill and Husky Stadium. As under Beacon Hill, there are layers of sand through which the tunnel boring machines will pass.

Sound Transit to State Auditor Brian Sonntag on annual independent performance audits: The answer is NO

Sound Transit is misrepresenting operating & maintenance costs in financials for the future

Issues in the first Prop 1 election which Sound Transit lost, not that much different than issues in the second Prop 1 election that Sound Transit won.

Sound Transit's plan to install light rail passenger train tracks on the I-90 Lake Washington floating bridge would reduce vehicle, passenger, and freight capacity;

Sound Transit reports that the $5 billion ten-year Sound Move program approved in 1996 is now a $15 billion program through 2020.

Bogota, Colombia runs a million-passengers-per-day bus-based mass transit system.

Sound Transit Citizen Oversight Panel concerned about operating and maintenance costs.

King County implementation of significant Metro Bus expansion is underway, including five new BRT lines.

Sound Transit releases Final Environmental Impact Statement for the six-mile light rail subway between downtown Seattle and Northgate, the Seattle "Big Dig."

King County Metro posts trip cost calculator focused on gasoline price vs bus fare.

High Quality Bus Services Attract as Many New Riders as Rail

CETA recommends USDOT analyze monorail and light rail history and results before recertifying Puget Sound Regional Council to continue conducting transportation planning

Planning Tutorial -- USDOT asks questions, Puget Sound Regional Council provides answers on meeting transportation planning requirements. 

Let Voters Trust Transportation Planning by Richard Harkness, Dick Paylor, and Bill Popp (extended version of Op-Ed in the September 30, 2005 Seattle Post Intelligencer, with research sources)

Bias and Misrepresentation in Sound Transit Analysis of East King County Transit Options

Sound Transit and its Citizen Oversight Panel by Emory Bundy

Updated Sound Transit Report Card by Emory Bundy, reformatted with graphics in pdf

How Sound Transit Abused the Planning Process to Promote Light Rail by Richard C. Harkness, Ph.D

PITF Resource Hot Links (useful documents for researchers)!

Click Here for Archive of Sound Transit Board Meeting Video Recordings

 

Click for real-time Puget Sound regional travel times from Washington State DOT

 

 

Powered by WebRing.

Viewings since 1996: Hit Counter

Google

 


world wide web www.bettertransport.info

Introduction

In November 1996 citizens living in the central Puget Sound region of the Pacific Northwest of the U.S. voted to raise their local taxes and begin implementation of a ten year, $3,900,000,000 rail and bus plan to expand public transportation facilities and services. The plan -- after 12 years overrunning both the approved budget and the original schedule -- is administered by a public agency and special government taxing district, the Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (RTA), later renaming itself Sound Transit. This region includes parts of three counties and the major Washington State cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Bellevue and Everett, with a total regional population of about 3 million.

This web site is maintained by a group of Puget Sound area residents who have since 1996 opposed certain parts of the Plan including light rail. We knew back then that voters were deceived about what they were approving, and we said so during the 1996 campaign. In December 2000, Sound Transit revealed that its Seattle light rail plan would cost $1,000,000,000 more than what voters approved, and take three additional years to build. As of early 2009, the first light rail line in Seattle is coming in shorter than orginally specified, and at least triple the cost that voters approved. Important parts of the 1996 plan have been delayed until a phase 2 doubling of the Sound Transit sales tax. Unfortunately, a $23 billion phase 2 expansion plan was approved by voters on November 4, 2008 by a margin of 57% to 43%. This approval came despite false claims made by Sound Transit about cost and performance, as documented within this site.

This Public Interest Transportation Forum presents information that bears on replacing light rail with other available options that would be implemented faster, cost less, and at the same time achieve better levels of mobility, environmental quality, economic vitality, and general welfare in the region than are currently anticipated in the official Plan. More on why we are doing this.

Sound Transit began limited daily commuter rail service from Seattle to Tacoma in September 2000, and initiated 1.6 miles of tram service -- built with tracks that would support four-car light rail trains -- in Tacoma in 2003. According to the current schedule, Seattle light rail is planned to open in 2009. The Seattle region already has an excellent bus-HOV transit system, organized by county, in which Sound Transit now operates express bus service. To learn more about the existing transit systems, click here. 

 Following video from Sightline Institute makes a point about gaining more efficient mobility on roads with HOV lanes carrying buses and vanpools:

 

Co-editors Nelson and Niles have conducted university-funded research on transit-oriented development. Check out a series of papers and presentations for the Transportation Research Board.

Co-editor Jerry Schneider operates another web site, Innovative Transportation Technologies.

Table of Contents

bullet

The popular initiative of Seattle citizens in 1997 and 2000 to build a citywide Monorail resulted in a 14 mile initial line approved by voters on November 5, 2002, but the project is now terminated.

bullet

Basic Description of the 1996 RTA "Sound Move" Rail and Bus Plan, including a map of the RTA System as promised to voters in 1996

bullet Puget Sound Regional Council takes up the meaning of Least Cost Planning
bullet

Emory Bundy reviews the history of Link Light Rail

bullet

Sound Transit 1999 EIS Document Predicts that Link Light Rail to Northgate Won't Change Seattle Rush Hour Traffic in 2010

bullet

Quick links for Seattle Light Rail invisible.gif (809 bytes)

bullet

Assessing Public Opinion on Link Light Rail

bullet

Citizens for Mobility sued FTA and Sound Transit in Federal Court, and lost

bullet

Niles to Regional Council: Audit whether Sound Transit is really supporting Vision 2020

bullet

Talking points on Central Link Light Rail

bullet

Seattle's Light Rail: 272 Daily Trains over Four Miles At-Grade Likely to Cause 8 Collision Deaths per Decade

bullet

Dick Nelson's comprehensive review of the 2002 Seattle Monorail Green Line Proposal

bullet

Bus Rapid Transit using Diesel-Electric Hybrids costs less and does more than Link Light Rail

bullet

Sounder commuter train to Everett will cost taxpayers about $100 for each individual ride for the next 20 years

bullet

R-E-S-P-E-C-T the Voters, D-E-F-E-A-S-E the Bonds

bullet

Court Rules that Sound Transit Can Build Light Rail that Costs More, and Has Fewer Stations

bullet

Survey: Light Rail Would Sink the Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID) Funding Package

bullet

Seattle Light Rail Opponents Fail to Force an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Light Rail Changes to the Downtown Bus Tunnel

bullet

Unresolved Issues With the Link Light Rail FFGA

bullet

Link Light Rail Initial Segment Should Have Been "Not Recommended" in the FTA New Starts Rating

bullet

Three Ways That Subarea Equity Is Threatened

bullet

Twenty-One Mile Link System Cost Overrun Trending Toward Five Billion Dollars

bullet

Seven Billion Dollars and No Way to Pay (Yet)

bullet

Trains in the Seattle Bus Tunnel Will Reduce Quality of Transit Service and Make Downtown Congestion Worse

bullet

Least-Cost Transportation Planning Papers by Dick Nelson and Don Shakow. These papers apply to transportation the kind of thinking that pulled the region back from the nuclear plants of WPPSS.  Also called integrated resource planning.

bullet

"The Sound Transit 'starter' system need not be a rail line in Seattle"...Prescient 1999 Op-Ed in the Seattle Times by Dick Nelson, Jim MacIsaac, and Dick Morrill

bullet

We Told You So: Classic Essays from Past Years on Puget Sound Area Transportation Issues

bullet

Dick Nelson on Transportation and Land Use Performance: Seattle vs. Portland

bullet

Alternative to Link Light Rail Proposed by Former Seattle Transit Official Chuck Collins

bullet

Dick Nelson on major issues in Destination 2030, the Puget Sound Regional Council's Draft Metropolitan Transportation Plan

bullet

Emory Bundy or Aaron Ostrom: Which Environmentalist is Right?

bullet

Jim MacIsaac's Analysis of Destination 2030

bullet

Unresolved Regional Transportation Issues, including the SR 520 corridor.

bullet

Critical commentary on the RTA Plan, pre-1998

bullet

Perspective on the Roles and Activities of Various Participants in the Fall, 1996, RTA Campaign

bullet

Innovative Transportation Technologies (including Monorails)

bullet

Light Rail including information on Portland's MAX system

bullet

Commuter Rail

bullet

Sound Transit Regional Express and County-Run Bus Systems could become Bus Rapid Transit

bullet

The Regional HOV System

bullet

PITF Editors Suggest Improvements in the City of Seattle Transportation Strategic Plan

bullet

Encouraging Carpools and Vanpools

bullet

Transportation Demand Management (TDM)

bullet

Telecommuting, Teleservice, and Other Telesubstitution

bullet

Intelligent Transportation Systems Track the location of buses on your home or office computer so you know if your bus is still coming or already gone!

bullet

Land Use Issues - Transit Oriented Development

bullet

Road Tolls and Congestion Pricing

bullet

Other Approaches to Congestion

bullet

Transportation Finance

bullet

E-Mails and Letters to the Editors

bullet Reciprocal Hot Links
 
bullet

Contributions to this Forum are Welcome

bullet

About the Editors and Contributors        D                                                         

HELP US TO TELL OTHERS ABOUT THIS SITE!

Last Modified: May 17, 2009

Jump to Top of Page

Contact the Editors via email: niles@globaltelematics.com

NO PERSONAL INFORMATION IS COLLECTED ON THIS WEBSITE